Comparing dynamic and static test results of bored piles

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Long, Michael (Michael M.)
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-25T15:54:42Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-25T15:54:42Z
dc.date.copyright 2007 Thomas Telford Publishing Ltd. en
dc.date.issued 2007-01
dc.identifier.citation Proceedings of the ICE - Geotechnical Engineering en
dc.identifier.issn 1353-2618
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10197/3094
dc.description.abstract Due to increasing time, cost and transportation difficulties, Irish contractors are seeking an alternative to conventional static pile load tests. As a result several firms have adopted dynamic testing techniques to supplement and in some cases to replace conventional static tests. In order to assess the reliability of the systems and to address the concerns of owners and consulting engineers, a database comprising 43 pairs of static and dynamic tests on piles from 24 sites around Ireland has been assembled. The database was limited to medium to large diameter continuous flight auger (CFA) piles, typically 450 mm to 600 mm in diameter. Comparisons between actual measured settlement in static tests and predicted settlement for dynamic tests showed a clear pattern of underestimation of settlement by the dynamic tests, with the ratio between the two values typically varying between 0.4 and 1.2, with an average of about 0.8. This is due to the limited energy being imparted to the pile in the dynamic test. The results were best for piles in rock and worst for piles in clay. Scatter in the results increased with increasing pile load. However as all of the measured settlements were modest, the absolute numerical difference between the actual and predicted values was typically less than 3 mm, which may not be significant in many practical cases. For piles supporting non - sensitive structures, in areas where the ground conditions are well know, and provided the ratio the drop weight to the pile weight and to the pile SWL is at least 50% and 1.5% respectively, it seems possible that static tests can be replaced by dynamic ones. However for structures sensitive to settlement or for those in areas where ground conditions are uncertain, then it is suggested that the dynamic test should be calibrated by at least one static test. en
dc.description.sponsorship Not applicable en
dc.format.extent 114339 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Institution of Civil Engineers en
dc.relation.requires Architecture, Landscape & Civil Engineering Research Collection en
dc.relation.requires Critical Infrastructure Group Research Collection en
dc.relation.requires Urban Institute Ireland Research Collection en
dc.rights This is an electronic version of an article published in Proceedings of the ICE - Geotechnical Engineering, 160 (1): 43-49, available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geng.2007.160.1.43. en
dc.subject Piles and piling en
dc.subject Dynamics en
dc.subject.lcsh Piling (Civil engineering)--Materials--Dynamic testing en
dc.title Comparing dynamic and static test results of bored piles en
dc.title.alternative Comparison of dynamic and static test results for cast in situ bored piles en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.internal.webversions http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geng.2007.160.1.43 en
dc.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.volume 160 en
dc.identifier.issue 1 en
dc.identifier.startpage 43 en
dc.identifier.endpage 49 en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1680/geng.2007.160.1.43
dc.neeo.contributor Long|Michael (Michael M.)|aut| en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.

Search Research Repository


Advanced Search

Browse