A bibliometric study of video retrieval evaluation benchmarking (TRECVid) : a methodological analysis

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Thornley, Clare V.
dc.contributor.author McLoughlin, Shane J.
dc.contributor.author Johnson, Andrea C.
dc.contributor.author Smeaton, Alan F.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-07-25T13:24:19Z
dc.date.available 2011-07-25T13:24:19Z
dc.date.copyright 2011 The authors en
dc.date.issued 2011-12-19
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Information Science en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10197/3038
dc.description.abstract This paper provides a discussion and analysis of methodological issues encountered during a scholarly impact and bibliometric study within the field of computer science (TRECVid Text Retrieval and Evaluation Conference, Video Retrieval Evaluation). The purpose of this paper is to provide a reflection and analysis of the methods used to provide useful information and guidance for those who may wish to undertake similar studies, and is of particular relevance for the academic disciplines which have publication and citation norms that may not perform well using traditional tools. Scopus and Google Scholar are discussed and a detailed comparison of the effects of different search methods and cleaning methods within and between these tools for subject and author analysis is provided. The additional database capabilities and usefulness of “Scopus More” in addition to “Scopus General” is discussed and evaluated. Scopus paper coverage is found to favourably compare to Google Scholar but Scholar consistently has superior performance at finding citations to those papers. These additional citations significantly increase the citation totals and also change the relative ranking of papers. Publish or Perish (PoP), a software wrapper for Google Scholar, is also examined and its limitations and some possible solutions are described. Data cleaning methods, including duplicate checks, expert domain checking of bibliographic data, and content checking of retrieved papers are compared and their relative effects on paper and citation count discussed. Google Scholar and Scopus are also compared as tools for collecting bibliographic data for visualisations of developing trends and, due to the comparative ease of collecting abstracts, Scopus is found far more effective. en
dc.description.sponsorship Not applicable en
dc.format.extent 698972 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Sage en
dc.relation.requires CLARITY Research Collection en
dc.subject Bibliometrics en
dc.subject Video retrieval en
dc.subject Research evaluation en
dc.subject Scholarly impact en
dc.subject Computer science en
dc.subject Citation analysis en
dc.subject.lcsh Bibliometrics en
dc.subject.lcsh Information retrieval--Research en
dc.subject.lcsh Digital video--Research en
dc.subject.lcsh Visualization en
dc.title A bibliometric study of video retrieval evaluation benchmarking (TRECVid) : a methodological analysis en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.internal.webversions http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551511420032 en
dc.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.volume 37 en
dc.identifier.issue 6 en
dc.identifier.startpage 577 en
dc.identifier.endpage 593 en
dc.neeo.contributor Thornley|Clare V.|aut| en
dc.neeo.contributor McLoughlin|Shane J.|aut| en
dc.neeo.contributor Johnson|Andrea C.|aut| en
dc.neeo.contributor Smeaton|Alan F.|aut| en
dc.description.admin 12M embargo - AV 20/7/2011 Author says it will be online in August, check then for published version - OR 25/7/11 Author has confirmed with publisher that accepted version can be made available when published online at end August - OR 02/08/2011 en

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.

Search Research Repository

Advanced Search